« November 2005 | Main | January 2006 »
Might seem a bit strange to commit a whole post on the 'Buy Now' button, but after reading "Does your buy button suck? How to make a buy button that customers will love to click" in the WebmasterWorld Forum, I have to admit it's worth discussing. If your business sells green products, you need to consider all the details of your online marketing strategies.
The author stresses the importance of making your buy button work for you and covers the following aspects (and manages to relate them to Einstein's theory of relativity):
Posted by Nathaniel Richman on December 27, 2005 at 10:49 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack
The Guerrilla Consulting Blog has a website self-assessment test that you can complete for free. Once completed it will analyze the results and send you a report with suggestions on how you can improve your site.
I think it's a worth while test to do and agree with most of the questions. Questions include those related to:
I think it's a very useful tool and agree with most of the criteria. However, like many marketers, I am not big on flash introductions as they can distract from your message. I am also not big on pop-ups. They do work, but they are intrusive and can be somewhat cheesy.
After having 400 consultants take the test, they have summarized the results here. Here are some interesting statistics from the websites that are successful:
Take the test here.
Posted by Juliet Austin on December 23, 2005 at 05:07 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Newsweek's Dec. 19th issue ran an interesting story on search engine optimization worth reading. It talks about the importance of SEO and how it's become a huge business (and growing).
Of course, with this boom, comes all sorts of opportunists — ethical and not-so-ethical. The common terms for the two types are "white hat" and "black hat" — you can probably guess which one is which. It saddens me to see any unethical business having success, but some of the black hats manage to. It also really scares me to find out some of their methods. In particular, the Newsweek article touches on one anonymous black hat SEO who managed to "forcibly inject" a link to his site from Stony Brook University's site, thus getting his site a higher ranking.
There may be a certain lure to using a black hat SEO person/firm to get quick results, but keep in mind that they usually, eventually, do get caught and then the web site gets blacklisted by Google et al. Anyone who's unethical in their SEO practices probably is unethical in general business too, so don't expect your money back either.
Posted by Nathaniel Richman on December 20, 2005 at 10:28 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Robert Bly, the well known copywriter, wrote a great article on why he doesn't believe you should write your copy for the search engines.
Bob explains that you need to have a single core audience in mind if you want to write powerful copy. If you write for the search engines, then you are catering to them and not the reader.
His main points: Write the strongest selling copy you can aimed at the human reader and forget the search engines. When finished, check to ensure keywords are appropriately placed, but ... Never change a word of strong selling copy if that change will make it even one iota weaker, even if SEO best practices would endorse that change. Once the page is up and working (i.e., generating strong conversion), optimize for engines by experimenting with word changes, testing to ensure those edits don’t reduce conversions.
His main points:
Bob includes comments made by other copywriters he spoke to and most agree with his point of view.
I also use a method similar to Bob's. I write the copy first (or help my clients write theirs) and then go back and do some keyword research and make modifications to the copy, inserting keywords where appropriate as long as they don't take away from the copy itself. I find that well written copy that is geared to a specific target audience naturally will include a lot of the key words people use when searching for a particular product or service on the web.
Posted by Juliet Austin on December 16, 2005 at 06:03 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack
City Hippy and Triple Pundit have started The Carnival of the Green. Inspired by Carnival of the Capitalists, The Carnival of the Green travels to various green blogs. Each Monday a green blog hosts the carnival and then links to several other green posts of interest to the host.
This week's carnival is hosted by Jen's Green Journal. Jen has included posts on a variety of topics including green gift giving, a post debating real vs fake Christmas trees, recycling pros and cons, green washing campaigns by McDonald's and Walmart and a whole lot more.
Next week's carnival will be hosted by Dee's 'Dotes.
Check out the carnival. The hosts are posting a lot of great info that is of interest to socially responsible and ethical businesses, so go see what you can learn. And if you want to to act as a host for the Carnival of the Green you can go to City Hippy for information.
Update: Nathaniel and I will be hosting the Carnvial of the Green on May 22. See you there!
Posted by Juliet Austin on December 15, 2005 at 06:50 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
For all you out there starting up your own blog, here's a good primer: Blog Design Checklist, posted on Successful Blog.
Really, in designing a blog for your socially responsible business, you want to follow pretty much the same advice we're always preaching here for designing and effective website — i.e., keep it simple and easy to read, well organized, easy to navigate, quick to download, etc. With a blog, even more emphasis goes on readability (not that that should be overlooked on your website!). And in the checklist, they emphasize being able to easily find the author's bio/contact info.
Posted by Nathaniel Richman on December 13, 2005 at 10:17 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
A rather simple — and obvious to some — tip: when you're including an image on your website, size it down to the dimensions you want, in your image editing software, not in the HTML code. What this means is if you have a photo that is 400x600 pixels and you want it to show at 100x150 pixels on your page, use Photoshop, or whatever image editing software you use, to scale it down. The file size will be much lower and the image will download so much faster than if you leave the image large and rely on the browser to scale it down for you.
If you're using thumbnails of images and then asking viewers to click on those thumbnails for a larger view, I recommend creating two versions of the image — one for the thumbnail and one for the larger version. Most people don't mind waiting a bit longer for the larger version to download if it was their choice, rather than having to wait for a page to load simply because the creator was lazy.
Posted by Nathaniel Richman on December 9, 2005 at 09:11 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
A while ago, I pointed to a green web hosting service offered by sustainablemarketing.com." the greener side" blog has done a comparison of several green hosting companies that use solar or wind power certificates. Prices and services included are competitive with a lot of hosting companies.
And for all you Canadians who want to keep your $ in Canada there is The Green Web Host Inc.
Nathaniel has had some dialogue with Green Web Host Inc. about their plans but neither of us has transferred our service over yet to a green hosting company.
Posted by Juliet Austin on December 5, 2005 at 07:45 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Seth has a good post on how to market effectively using a combination of the "needle and vice approach" as opposed to the "rattle" approach.
In a nutshell, the "needle" approach requires focusing on "the right person, the right message, the right moment". These are targeted messages geared towards specific folks on a consistent basis that have an impact.
The "vice" approach involves spreading your message far and wide and eventually the word spreads.
The "rattle" approach is used by those who try out an approach here and there. Perhaps give up on the approach when they don't get the results they want and then and try another method for awhile and still don't get what they want. They get more obnoxious and louder as they try to get attention.
Seth concludes:
The best marketers, of course, use the needle and the vise at the same time. They don't assault, they don't demand, instead they earn attention. And they apply their marketing pressure so consistently and in such a measured and relentless way that sooner or later, they profit from it.
Marketing successfully takes careful planning and strategy. For small businesses in particular, I can see no better way to market effectively than using a consistent, strategic plan that you implement over a long period of time to a specific group of people who become your fans. Permission-based methods of marketing do work amazing well if you are patient and apply them properly. These techniques are also the best suited to socially responsible business practices.
For more information on permission marketing, check out Seth's book here.
Posted by Juliet Austin on December 4, 2005 at 02:28 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack